France eyeing ban on Tor

The dominoes may be beginning to tumble in the struggle between security and personal liberty, and the epicenter may be France as it responds to the recent attacks. Leaked documents from the Interior Ministry suggest that France might try to tighten the terrorist’s noose at the expense of personal freedom by banning Tor and blocking access to public Wi-Fi hotspots – all in the name of national security.

Though the proposals would only cover periods of declared emergencies, recent experience indicates that these repressive policies might linger. A mere tweak of the legislature’s collective nose immediately resulted in an extension of the current state of emergency to March 2016. And, as always with these things, one must be wary of government ”mission creep” that makes reversing a course or policy very difficult. But there are other considerations.


Public WiFi is not just the potential purview of terrorists. Blocking it would mean that many civilians, out and about during an emergency, would be denied vital information, including news of areas to avoid, closures, and directives detailing the nearest shelters. This a more cogent argument than it would seem could be made regarding banning Tor for the duration of an emergency. Yes, whistle blowers, activists, and journalists would be temporarily inconvenienced. After all, they could shortly resume their activities. The greater danger lies in the fact that once government encroaches, it is slow to retreat. There is also the risk of law enforcement manufacturing emergencies to gain the upper hand.

The French PM, Manuel Valls, seemed to consider these concerns when dismissing the alleged leaks as rumors, while at the same time hedging his bets. He stated that a “ban on Wi-Fi is not a course of action envisaged.” Valls also rejected calls to ban Tor, saying that he had not received requests from the police for such actions either, but then, as politicians are wont to do, he waffles a bit,

The Internet is a freedom… an extraordinary means of communication between people. It is a benefit to the economy. It is also a means for terrorists to communicate and spread their totalitarian ideology. The police must take in all these aspects to improve their fight against terrorism, but the measures we take must be effective.

The potentially repressive rhetoric is fraught with dangers if it goes beyond simple ruminations. The likelihood that other sympathetic, neighboring countries might follow suit would mean that people could not simply change the location of their communication. In fact, as each domino falls in the already fragile amalgamation that is the EU today, this issue packs a potential punch. It could be just another crack in the foundation of the Union, or the proverbial straw that breaks its back.

In either case, the result is unpalatable, for at the very least, the proposed measures move the EU closer to the situation that exists in China with its Great Firewall. Up until now, it is the only country to (semi) successfully block Tor. That France risks joining the paranoid regime is a dubious distinction indeed, for the country once thought a keystone of liberty and equality.

Stan Ward has enjoyed writing for 50 years. Writing has been a comfortable companion to a successful business and teaching career for him. Find him on Google+.

Related Coverage


3 responses to “France eyeing ban on Tor

  1. I struggle with this type of stuff. I love the idea of using TOR for legitimate purposes. But, I hate that criminals and terrorists use it. In the end, I still come out on the side of privacy. But, what good will privacy be to me if my family is dead? Like I said, it’s a struggle.

    1. Hi Daniel,

      These feels are understandable, but it worth remembering that:

      You are 17,600 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack

      – You are 12,571 times more likely to die from cancer than from a terrorist attack

      — You are 11,000 times more likely to die in an airplane accident than from a terrorist plot involving an airplane

      — You are 1048 times more likely to die from a car accident than from a terrorist attack

      –You are 404 times more likely to die in a fall than from a terrorist attack

      — You are 87 times more likely to drown than die in a terrorist attack

      – You are 13 times more likely to die in a railway accident than from a terrorist attack

      –You are 12 times more likely to die from accidental suffocation in bed than from a terrorist attack

      –You are 9 times more likely to choke to death on your own vomit than die in a terrorist attack

      –You are 8 times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a terrorist

      –You are 8 times more likely to die from accidental electrocution than from a terrorist attack

      – You are 6 times more likely to die from hot weather than from a terrorist attack

      More people in the UK are killed by bee stings than terrorists, and in the US you are 55 times more likely to be killed by the police than by a terrorist. You have to ask yourself whether such a tiny risk justifies wholesale invasion of every citizen’s privacy by their government…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *