China Requires GPS Devices on Vehicles

Stan Ward

Stan Ward

February 27, 2017

In the on-going privacy versus national security struggle, security has notched another victory – this time in a remote, northwest province of China. The prefecture has been plagued by domestic violence at the hands of separatists, but it would seem that the Chinese government wishes to deflect some of that criticism by blaming the attacks on Islamic terrorism.

To thwart the mayhem, the government has resorted to surveilling private and public vehicles. In complying with a new edict, the average, law-abiding Chinese citizen is surrendering another vestige of their ever-dwindling freedom.

In this latest chapter of the privacy-security battle, detailed in an article in the Guardian, police in the Bayingolin Mongol Autonomous Prefecture of Xinjiang have resorted to a drastic countermeasure. Authorities have ordered residents to install GPS tracking devices in their vehicles, in order to keep permanent tabs on driver’s movements.  As a result, once again, the Chinese citizen, like many around the globe, has meekly relinquished one of the few remaining freedoms – that of the open road-  in a nod toward supposed security and safety. Will we ever learn?

The propaganda arm of the prefecture’s government, Loulan News, said that the GPS trackers in individual’s cars would help “ensure social security and safety and promote social stability and harmony”. This is because cars are a popular means of getting around this remote region. You see, in the government’s mind, since terrorists use cars, all cars carry may terrorists. Rather than deal with the criminals, which is difficult, it is easier to surveil everyone.

And oh, by the way, the by-product benefit for the government is that another portion of everyday life is now under its microscope, and the citizenry under its thumbs.

The penalty for non-compliance is denial of petrol purchases at filling stations. Good luck trying to drive around the capacious countryside without gas! It sort of guarantees universal compliance, wouldn’t you think? Speaking about universal compliance, even “fast-moving terrorist-favored” vehicles, like bulldozers, fall under the decree. And trucks are also included. Indeed lorries have been used in notorious attacks such as the ones in Nice and, more recently, in Berlin. What good would a GPS do in those attacks?

China has been no stranger, either, to attacks using motor vehicles. In recent years, radicals with links to Xinjiang used vehicles to carry out a series of terror attacks, including one in a May 2014 market bombing in the capital Urumqi, and in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in October 2013. But, it’s difficult to imagine how tagging those vehicles with GPS could have prevented those assaults either, given the facts of the cases – the surprising swiftness of the assaults, and the element of surprise in both of them.

The latest area to be affected, though sparsely populated, has seen its share of sectarian violence – even predating the notorious riots of 2009. Since that time, the province has become more and more a police state. That is not likely to change in the foreseeable future. It may merely delay the inevitable ethnic clashes. James Leibold, a Xinjiang expert at Australia’s La Trobe university, said, “It probably( just) pushes resentment further underground.” For some in the political arena, out of sight is out of mind.

Many observers can understand the government turning to individually tracking cars with GPS devices, as opposed to taking broader measures like ubiquitous security cameras. In this far-flung remote location, cameras just aren’t practical. By the same token, it is easy to see why civil libertarians and privacy advocates elsewhere, who are looking on, would be alarmed that terrorism and the threat of violence against the public may be merely a ruse to allow the government to further insinuate itself into private lives.

One thing, however, is not debatable: once such a further attack on privacy such as this becomes ingrained in policy and accepted in practice, the trend never reverses itself, and it only leads to more repressive measures in the future.

Image credit: Google Maps.
Stan Ward

Stan Ward has enjoyed writing for 50 years. Writing has been a comfortable companion to a successful business and teaching career for him. Find him on Google+.

5 responses to “China Requires GPS Devices on Vehicles

  1. This is just for your information :
    § The land of china = the republic of china = the people of china , they are the owner of their roads : it cannot be bought so paying taxes or not is an irrelevant argument.
    § I do not know the china firm who built this device : why have you not ask them how many device they have installed yet and where and how much they have earned : i suspect a startup working with a satellite plan/project.
    § Installing a gps in a truck is an obligation ordered by the insurance company.
    § btw , the camera in the u.k, on the wall, in the street, in the corner of the flat are coming from a private arab fund : it is only business.
    § More a tool is sophisticated more you need skill, intelligent mind, common sense and sane spirit -and a lot of prudence- … gps is not in the right hands or these countries have not the human resources for running it but they pretend the opposite.
    # I do not know the government’s mind and if their action are against terrorism or criminal activities but using dna, gps, fingerprint or another tecknics you show an official guilty … Everyone knows that you cannot prepare & execute a terrorist attack without the help and the authorization of the mayor and the police force obviously.
    # The human being tattoo their children, dogs & cats, implement gps on birds, turtles & dolphins, for the scientific research -nobel price & high education required- it is not the fault of the citizen lambda if they are arrived at this level of obscenity & stupidity.
    # i do not worry about privacy in china, korea or japan like i do not worry about security in russia or switzerland ; they are using tools that they do not understand like a monkey plays with an empty coca-cola bottle dropped in the forest.
    # Marking on a gps map the irradiated zone should have been a better idea ; the radiation are glue on every plane, boats, wheels because the earth and the vehicles move and the winds move the zones & the density. gps should not have to be used for tracking human being but for taking care of the safe area of the earth : it is a pity.
    * hoping that they will not sell a gps embedded in a bicycle as new terrorism law (typing mistake : i meant anti- ).

    1. Hi makimoto,

      § The land of china = the republic of china = the people of china , they are the owner of their roads

      This was my point exactly. In my country roads are not privately owned either. So as a citizen of my country, the roads belong to me as much as to anyone else.

    1. Hi soonmybicycle,

      Well, I would consider the governmnet tracking everywhere I drive to be a major invasion of privacy! And as a tax-paying citizen, at least in my country that means I do own the road (at least in part).

  2. Surveilling everyone seems to be the constant theme worldwide. We already do it on an individual basis (IRL) on the internet and more personally on Operating Systems (mobile, Windows 10, etc). I really do believe that chips implanted on all of us may be a thing in the future.

    These chips may be originally sold as ID chips exposing medical data (I think this is already available), current physical metrics (already a thing via wearables), payments via chips (also a thing). At some point, it’ll just be “easier” to implant the chips directly into human bodies for requirements related to health coverage, immigration status, general police requested ID, licenses, etc…

    Seems far fetched now but the truth is that I would not have envisioned where we are now growing up in the 70s. Nearly all the effort by technology companies (already colluding with political parties) is based on tracking, data-gathering, data-storage and data-sharing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exclusive Offer
Get NordVPN for only
Get NordVPN for only