Net Neutrality Depends on Public Outcry

Stan Ward

Stan Ward

February 13, 2017

In the recently concluded US presidential election, the Oval Office occupant switched from Democrat to Republican. This has many repercussions, but none may be felt as swiftly or dramatically as the makeup of the FCC. This is not good news if you favor net neutrality.

As you may know, under former Obama appointee, Chairman Tom Wheeler, two years ago the FCC reclassified broadband as a Title II common carrier service. Thus, presently, the net neutrality rules prohibit home and mobile Internet providers from blocking or throttling traffic, or giving priority to web services in exchange for payment. This could now change.

Democrats in Washington are ramping up their rhetoric in support of net neutrality, ahead of a potential assault on it by the new Trump administration and its anti-net neutrality FCC Chairman, Ajit Pai. Democrats say that Pai is merely a pawn for ISPs, and is bent on doing their bidding. Aside from stoking fears and raising internet users’ temperatures, it is doubtful that, being in the minority in Congress, they can mount anything more than token opposition. That is, unless they can rally the public in favor of keeping the net neutrality rules.

Given the current situation on Capitol Hill, if President Trump is in favor of dismantling net neutrality, opponents can’t prevent it unless they can forge a coalition with some Republicans. The GOP already have one eye on the 2018 mid-term elections, in which, historically, the party in power is often given a reality check by the electorate. For Democrats, it represents a chance to make hay with voters by marshaling the apparently overwhelming support of citizens for the free and open internet that net neutrality now affords.

The Democrats think this is a possibility.

“Remember that two years ago, nearly 4 million Americans offered comments on the Open Internet Order,” Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) said at a press conference this morning.

He claims that is double the number of comments that the FCC ever received before on any other ruling. Another, Sen Markey, a Massachusetts Democratic senator, promises,

“[There will be] a political firestorm that will make the 4 million who communicated several years ago look like a minuscule number. Net neutrality rules ensure that those with the best ideas, not simply the best-funded ideas, have the opportunity to share their content with the world.”

Trump, who is keenly sensitive to such commentary, is bound to take notice. Of course, these people are attuned to the demographic makeup of these net neutrality apostles. If they seem to be the “elites” from either coast who vote Democrat blindly anyway, rather than the “rock-ribbed” Republicans of Middle America, then their outrage will hold less sway with him.

No, the net neutrality crowd is going to have to do something that the previous occupant of the White House loathed doing. They are going to have to reach across the aisle to snag some support among Republicans, who may be vulnerable in 2018 – especially if there is an anti-Trump backlash.

Concern regarding Trump’s choice of Pai for chairman is particularly disconcerting for Democrats. Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, has vowed to roll back net neutrality rules, as you might expect from such a company. But Pai is not alone in his zeal for a rollback. US Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) was recently named chairperson of a key Congressional subcommittee on telecommunications. She, net neutrality adherents know, introduced The Internet Freedom Act to reverse the net neutrality rules.

Numerous other Republicans have also jumped on the anti-net neutrality bandwagon, further ingratiating them to the cash-flush ISPs.

Of course, net neutrality’s demise is not certain, and some of the rules may remain in force and untouched. Pai decries depictions of him as some sort of malicious marauder. After his first FCC meeting as chairman, he said: “I favor a free and open Internet and I oppose Title II.” He did not say whether he intends to enforce the net neutrality rules that remain in place. So, it is possible that Title II designation is abandoned but that an open, free internet with healthy competition survives the feared Republican onslaught.

If you feel strongly about the issue, be sure to make your opinion known to your legislative leaders in Congress – especially if they are Republicans, and you are one of their constituents. In this populist political climate, more than any other time I can recall, public voices are being listened to, and are not just being given lip-service.

Image credit: 3dkombinat/

Stan Ward

Stan Ward has enjoyed writing for 50 years. Writing has been a comfortable companion to a successful business and teaching career for him. Find him on Google+.

3 responses to “Net Neutrality Depends on Public Outcry

  1. You forgot to mention any argument FOR net neutrality. Thay would help to motivate People. Because there is a very good argument against it.

    1. Hi Freedom guy,

      I can’t speak for Stan (the author of this article), but as far as I am concerned, net neutrality is vital if the internet is not to become yet another place of the have and have-nots. Under this dystopian model, only those wealthy enough will have full and unfettered access to the entire internet. Everyone else will need to make do with a curated “cable-style” content. This will severely limit digital (and therefore real-life) freedom, and stifle grass-roots innovation, as the internet will become the sole preserve of established megacorporations who have no incentive to change. It will also mean that most people have limited (or worse) access to content not pre-approved by vested interests, which is disastrous for democracy and free speech. A truly dystopian model, indeed.

  2. Net neutrality must be maintained. It is a form of free and open commerce and communication that must not be compromised. Any attack on net neutrality, any reduction in the free, unrestricted flow of data on the net is a recipe for economic and social disaster. The open Internet works beautifully, for everyone.
    Maybe that’s why the big ISP providers want to have control over the Internet, so they can take that work of beauty and squeeze dollars out of it for their benefit and to the detriment of everyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exclusive Offer
Get NordVPN for only
Get NordVPN for only